Controlled access
Authentication and role-aware application workflows help restrict administrative and candidate functions to the intended users.
Trust throughout the interview lifecycle
Security, privacy, and interview integrity.
SmartInterviews.AI combines controlled access, protected interview evidence, system-defined integrity safeguards, and reviewable evaluation rationale. The goal is straightforward: help authorized teams conduct and review interviews responsibly.
SmartInterviews Trust Model
AccessAuthenticated and role-aware workflows
EvidenceResponses, recordings, scores, and rationale
IntegrityIdentity and activity safeguards
GovernancePrivacy policies and accountable review
Our approach
Protection is more than infrastructure.
A trustworthy interview platform must protect information, preserve the integrity of the assessment, and make automated evaluation reviewable by people.
Evidence preservation
Interview responses, recordings, scores, and evaluation rationale provide a reviewable record of the assessment.
Interview integrity
Identity checks, recording, activity monitoring, and system-defined proctoring safeguards support consistent interview conditions.
Candidate privacy
Candidate-facing notices and dedicated policies explain how personal information, images, and interview recordings are handled.
Reviewable evaluation
Question-level scores and rationale allow hiring teams to inspect the evidence instead of relying on an unexplained result.
Human accountability
AI supports structured assessment. Hiring decisions and appropriate review remain the responsibility of the hiring organization.
Access and authentication
The platform separates candidate and administrative workflows and applies authenticated access to protected business functions.
- Authenticated administrative sessions
- Role-aware application access
- Time-bound candidate interview access
- Client and account boundaries
Candidate information
Candidate profiles and interview context are used to schedule, conduct, and evaluate authorized interviews. Access should remain limited to users with a legitimate hiring or assessment purpose.
- Candidate-specific interview tokens
- Controlled interview access windows
- Candidate check-in workflow
- Dedicated candidate privacy information
Recordings and assessment evidence
Where recording is used, it provides reviewable interview evidence alongside transcripts, submitted practical work, scores, and evaluation rationale.
- Question-level response records
- Interview video and audio evidence
- Practical-task submissions
- Score and rationale history
Recording and retention requirements can vary by organization and jurisdiction. Customers should align their use of the platform with applicable notice, consent, employment, and privacy obligations.
Interview integrity
System-defined safeguards help establish consistent assessment conditions and surface events that may require human review.
- Pre-interview identity image
- Fullscreen and visibility monitoring
- Interview activity and violation records
- Response recording where enabled by the workflow
Integrity indicators are review signals, not automatic proof of misconduct. Hiring teams should review context before reaching a conclusion.
Evaluation traceability
Structured evaluation is designed to remain inspectable. Reviewers can consider the question, candidate response, score, and supporting rationale together.
- Discipline-aware evaluation criteria
- Question-level feedback and rationale
- Practical-task assessment
- Human review of hiring evidence
Privacy and governance
Our legal and privacy materials describe the policies applicable to candidate information, recordings, cookies, and data-processing relationships.
This page describes product practices and capabilities; it does not claim a certification or guarantee compliance for every customer use case.
Need to evaluate the platform for your organization?
Tell us about your security, privacy, retention, or interview-integrity requirements. We can discuss the relevant workflow and documentation with your team.